Letterboxing USA - Yahoo Groups Archive

Retired boxes Re: [LbNA] Quick LBNA Question

4 messages in this thread | Started on 2006-02-16

Retired boxes Re: [LbNA] Quick LBNA Question

From: J A R S (ontario_cacher@yahoo.ca) | Date: 2006-02-16 09:39:40 UTC-05:00
Follow-up suggestions:
Could the retired boxes be suppressed i.e. hidden so that they don't show up on the active list? Perhaps the site could have a search feature for those who want to see retired boxes?

JARS

lininil wrote: When I try to cancel a retired box the LBNA site actually tries to convince me to keep it
because finders may be tagged to it. Personally I hate to have to wade through obsolete
clues but I'm sure others like to see what was. Would there be an advantage to the site to
let these obsolete clues go elsewhere or be deleted and allow the finder's tags to remain
for deleted boxes for those who like the service? I have not deleted my retired boxes
because of the message I get.
CMoon



---------------------------------
Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Retired boxes Re: [LbNA] Quick LBNA Question

From: Rebekah (littlemonkey324@hotmail.com) | Date: 2006-02-17 01:28:34 UTC
What if there were a Yahoo Group similar to "the basement" where
people could look for them & maybe have a file or something in the
database section where people could add if they had found a box

-Littlemonkey

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, J A R S
wrote:
>
> Follow-up suggestions:
> Could the retired boxes be suppressed i.e. hidden so that they
don't show up on the active list? Perhaps the site could have a
search feature for those who want to see retired boxes?
>
> JARS
>
> lininil wrote: When I try to cancel a
retired box the LBNA site actually tries to convince me to keep it
> because finders may be tagged to it. Personally I hate to have to
wade through obsolete
> clues but I'm sure others like to see what was. Would there be an
advantage to the site to
> let these obsolete clues go elsewhere or be deleted and allow the
finder's tags to remain
> for deleted boxes for those who like the service? I have not
deleted my retired boxes
> because of the message I get.
> CMoon
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





Retired boxes Re: [LbNA] Quick LBNA Question

From: gwendontoo (foxsecurity@earthlink.net) | Date: 2006-02-17 06:04:02 UTC
--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Rebekah"
wrote:
>
> What if there were a Yahoo Group similar to "the basement" where
> people could look for them & maybe have a file or something in the
> database section where people could add if they had found a box
>
> -Littlemonkey


Hi Littlemonkey

If you look to the lefthand side of the homepage you will find a
listing for Database. If you click on this you can locate the
remnants of the database that caused the uproar quite sometime back.
This was a listing that allowed finders to record their finds and
this was detested by many planters(and still is). Several planters
pulled their clues and others came close. Shortly after this
function went away there was atleast one Yahoo group started that
decided to list finds and shortcuts. Many planters started putting a
notice on their clue sheets regarding notification of finds (if
interested you could check anyone of our clue sheets for this
notice).Then the flags appeared which did give the placer a little
more controll over their clues.
The entire concept of recording finds generally is split between
the newletterboxers that like electronic recording and listing and
the old letterboxers (Silverbacks) that like the way the game was
originally set up here in the USA, where the site was merely a
collection of clue sheets. Now notice I said generally, otherwise
someone will jump in and dispute my statement. Also generally those
that do not like the recording aspect are those with the most plants
and there is a different point of view that planters have as
compared to those that are finders. The recording functions only
help finders locate those letterboxes that can be assured of being
viable thus increasing their F count.
As a placer I could care less about someones F count. We set up our
letterboxes to take a finder to a neat spot, solve clues,a bit of
history, great scenery,and give them an image of a passable
handcarved stamp.
This database/recording topic is nothing new, and for the most part
will always be a contentious one, I think it is a great subject. It
is a good idea for everyone to realize that placers have different
mindsets than finders. A planter may take several days to set up a
letterbox, while a finder may take an hour or two to locate that
same box. A note of thanks sent to that placer via the chatlist or
directly may add a minute or two to the finders time. That is about
the same amount of time it takes to electronically record the find.

Okay nuff about history, and a planter's point of view.

Don




Retired boxes Re: [LbNA] Quick LBNA Question

From: lesliekusz (lesliekusz@yahoo.com) | Date: 2006-02-21 04:58:29 UTC
--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "gwendontoo" wrote:
>
>
>there is a different point of view that planters have as
> compared to those that are finders. The recording functions only
> help finders locate those letterboxes that can be assured of being
> viable thus increasing their F count.
> As a placer I could care less about someones F count. We set up our
> letterboxes to take a finder to a neat spot, solve clues,a bit of
> history, great scenery,and give them an image of a passable
> handcarved stamp.

Thank you for taking the time to give this point of view. It's good for those of us who
haven't placed any boxes yet to keep in mind that placing a letterbox is a very involved
process and this makes me value even more the planters of the really good letterboxes I've
been able to find thus far. Thanks to you and everyone else who has planted or is planting
them now. I don't think that we can praise you too often!